|
3. Also, as
Where C is an arbitrary constant. 4. If the rate of change with
respect to time is zero, then the above expression must be constant and
we shall call it Em.
In the above equation we have
that the first term is the kinetic energy per unit of mass and that the
constant C must be interpreted as the value of the reference point for
which the potential energy is rendered to zero As a conclusion, we can
state that the specific mechanic energy (per unit of mass) of a body in
motion around another is the sum of its kinetic energy and its potential
energy and that it remains constant along all the orbit without
increasing nor decreasing. That is, the Specific mechanic
energy is
Conservation of the angular momentum The constant of the angular
momentum for the movement of our two body system can be derived as
follows: 1. Multiply
equation 2.4 by r (cross
product from vectorial calculus):
2. As in general,
3. Now, as
The expression r
x v, which is a constant of
the movement, is represented by the vector h,
is known as the Specific angular
momentum. Based on the above, we have seen
how the Specific angular moment of a body in motion around another
remains constant along all of its orbit. That is, the Specific angular
momentum is:
Now, as h is the vectorial cross
product of r and v,
h will always be
perpendicular to the plane that contains these two vectors. And because,
as seen, h is constant then
r and v
must always be confined to the same plane and therefore we
can conclude that the movement of out two bodies does indeed remain
confined within a same plane which of course is known as the orbital
plane. The magnitude of vector h
can be derived through the geometry depicted in figure 2.2 for vectors r
and v.
Figure 2.2 If we define that the vertical
direction is towards the position vector and that the horizontal
direction is perpendicular, then we can define the direction of the
velocity vector v by means
of the angle
with the vertical. The angle
formed between the velocity vector and
the horizontal direction is called the trajectory angle and is specially
useful in the study of the movement of artificial satellites. From the definition of the
angular momentum vector, we have that its magnitude is:
The sign of
is that of the product r.v. Trajectory equation: By means of equation 2.3 we
defined the relative movement of one body with respect of the other.
Even as this equation is relatively simple, its complete solution and
the description of movement as a function of time is rather complex.; we
can however reach a partial solution which will give us important
information about the shape and geometry of the orbit. Recalling that the movement
equation is (equation 2.4):
If we carry out the cross
vectorial product with vector h,
we find
Now, as
Additionally, we have that
(multiplying
by the derivative of the unit vector):
Therefore, we can say that:
Equation which after integrating
at both sides, is equivalent to:
Where B is a constant of
integration. If we carry out the product of this equation with r,
we obtain the following scalar equation:
As in general,
Where
is the angle between the constant
vector B and vector
r. Now, solving the above equation
for r, we finally obtain:
Equation 2.10 defines the
geometry of the trajectory of a body in gravitational motion around
another, expressed in polar coordinates and where angle
is measured from vector B
towards vector r. From analytic geometry, the
general equation of the conic curves family (described ahead) expressed
in polar coordinates and with the origin in one the foci is:
Now, it should be clear to the
reader that equation 2.11 is mathematically equivalent to equation 2.10
and thus we can conclude that the orbit of a two body system is a conic
curve which retains all of its properties and characteristics. In equation 2.11, p is known as
the parameter of the curve (also known as the "semi-latus
rectum" ) and e is called the eccentricity of the conic,
which y itself determines its shape and its main characteristics. By comparing both equations
2.10 and 2.11 we can immediately conclude that:
|